DLA Piper LLP (US) | ||
1251 Avenue of the Americas | ||
New York, NY 10020-1104 | ||
www.dlapiper.com | ||
Sidney Burke | ||
Sidney.Burke@dlapiper.com | ||
T 212.335.4509 |
April 27, 2022 |
VIA EDGAR
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
Division of Corporation Finance
100 F Street, N.E.
Judiciary Plaza
Washington, D.C. 20549
Attention: | Tracie Mariner Angela Connell Daniel Crawford Celeste Murphy |
Re: | Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III |
Revised Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A
Filed April 8, 2022
File No. 001-40128
Dear Mses. Mariner, Connell and Murphy and Mr. Crawford:
This letter is submitted on behalf of Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III (the Company) in response to the comments of the staff of the Division of Corporation Finance (the Staff) of the Securities and Exchange Commission with respect to the above-referenced Revised Preliminary Proxy Statement on Schedule 14A filed on April 8, 2022 (the Preliminary Proxy Statement), as set forth in your letter dated April 20, 2022, addressed to Steven J. Heyer, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Company (the Comment Letter). The Company is concurrently filing Amendment No. 2 to the Preliminary Proxy Statement (the Second Amended Proxy Statement), which includes changes that reflect responses to the Staffs comments.
The responses provided herein are based upon information provided to DLA Piper LLP (US) by the Company. For reference purposes, the text of the Comment Letter has been reproduced herein with the response below the comment. For your convenience, we have italicized the reproduced Staff comments from the Comment Letter. Defined terms used in this letter not otherwise defined have the meanings ascribed to such terms in the Second Amended Proxy Statement.
Revised Preliminary Proxy Statement filed April 8, 2022.
Information About Biote
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2022
Page 2
What We Offer
Biote Business Model/Solution, page 240
1. | We note Exhibit No. 99.1 in your report dated March 29, 2022 on form 8-K provides additional detail on Biotes business. For example, page 11 makes it appear Biotes hormone therapy solution does not include over-the-counter pills, prescription creams, patches, pills, or injectables, but instead, uses pellet implants as described by the graphic on page 11 that appears to show hormone pellets held in a persons hand and the corresponding text above the hand. As another example, we note on page 49 that Biote charges a service fee averaging $180 for every hormone optimization procedure, accounting for 79% of Biotes revenue. Please revise your proxy statement here to disclose the methods of hormone optimization (e.g., pellet implants, prescription pills) used by your practitioners that entitle Biote to service fees. |
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has modified its disclosure on pages 242, 246, 247, 248 and 251 of the Second Amended Proxy Statement as requested.
Competition, page 252
2. | We note your response to comment 23 and reissue in part. Please revise your disclosure to provide more detail on the competition you face in the dietary supplement space. For example only, disclose whether there are other competitors that sell branded dietary supplements through certified practitioners and identify them. |
Response: The Company acknowledges the Staffs comment and has modified its disclosure on pages 64 and 258 of the Second Amended Proxy Statement as requested.
* * *
[Signature page immediately follows.]
United States Securities and Exchange Commission
April 27, 2022
Page 3
If you have any questions regarding the foregoing responses or otherwise, please do not hesitate to call me at (212) 335-4509 or Stephen P. Alicanti at (212) 335-4783.
Sincerely, |
DLA Piper LLP (US) |
/s/ Sidney Burke |
Sidney Burke |
Partner |
cc: | Christopher Bradley, Haymaker Acquisition Corp. III |
Stephen P. Alicanti, DLA Piper LLP (US)
Michal Berkner, Cooley LLP
Ryan Sansom, Cooley LLP
Peter Byrne, Cooley LLP